vs Landchecker
Keep Landchecker for the map. Add Feasibly for the schedule answer.
Landchecker is the property-intelligence platform: the map, the aerial imagery, the sales comparables, the title and permit documents. What it does not do is interpret the schedule: it shows you the zone code, not what the council’s schedule actually allows. Feasibly does that one thing, source-linked, confidence-tagged, and piped straight into your AI workflow.
Head to head
What each one is actually for
Landchecker and Feasibly overlap on the surface and diverge underneath. Most teams use both. The question is which one you reach for.
| Landchecker | With Feasibly | |
|---|---|---|
| Core job | Property-intelligence platform: display the map, the data and the documents in one place. | Interpret the planning schedule: what the controls actually are for this address, source-linked. |
| Zone & schedule | Shows the zone code on a map. Does not interpret the schedule clause: you read the planning scheme yourself. | 620+ council schedule interpretations: min lot, garden area, height, setbacks, each with its source clause and last-verified date. |
| Source citation | Data display: no per-claim source URL or confidence score. | Every value links to the exact clause or layer and carries a verified / machine-extract / default tag. |
| Permit triggers | Tracks lodged permits and DA history, what others did nearby. | Tells you what triggers a permit here: the overlay clauses and the exemptions for your works. |
| Amendment monitoring | Permit / DA alerts (downstream). | Daily clause-level scheme-amendment monitor (upstream): stale schedule values get flagged. |
| Map, imagery, comparables | Mature map UI, Aerometrex aerial, sales history, Site Finder. Best in class. | None, no map, no imagery, no comparables. Deliberately. Use Landchecker for these. |
| Title & documents | Buy title, plan of subdivision and council documents in-platform. | Not offered. Feasibly is data, not a document shop. |
| Delivery | Web app + maps. API gated to Enterprise. | MCP-native (runs inside Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor), plus REST. API from the entry tier. |
| Coverage | National: VIC, NSW, QLD, SA, WA, TAS (ACT coming) at data-display depth. | 7 states for zone and overlays; VIC schedule-deep (620+ schedules). Honest depth tiers. |
| Pricing | Free Starter; ~$75/mo Standard; $200/mo Advanced; per-seat. Per-report $24.90. | Free 20/mo; $29 for 200. Credit-based, no per-seat. Per-report sits under their ceiling. |
| If a value is wrong | No per-claim guarantee. | Wrong-zone guarantee: free lookup + 10 credits + a public correction. |
Decision
When to reach for each
Reach for Landchecker when you need to…
- See the property on a map with aerial imagery
- Pull sales comparables or a sales history
- Buy a title, plan of subdivision, or council document
- Check lodged permits and DA history in the area
- Browse and consolidate sites visually
Reach for Feasibly when you need to…
- Know what the schedule actually allows, not just the zone code
- A source-linked, confidence-tagged answer you can defend later
- Whether your works trigger a permit, and the exemptions
- To screen a pipeline of addresses inside your AI tool, in seconds
- Schedule data that is monitored daily for amendments
Closing
Our honest position
- Landchecker is the entrenched leader, and it is genuinely good at being a map-first property platform. We do not try to be that.
- Feasibly wins one thing decisively: schedule-grade interpretation, cited and confidence-tagged, delivered to your LLM.
- Because we are MCP-native, you do not have to choose: chain Feasibly into your existing Landchecker workflow.
- If you only ever need the map and the documents, use Landchecker. If you need the schedule answer source-linked, that is us.